Tweed Shire Council Planning Committee Meeting 4th September
RECOMMENDED that Development Application DA14/0013 for a boundary adjustment at Lot 2 DP 1130911 No. 707 Limpinwood Road, Limpinwood; Lot 136 DP 755724; Tyalgum Road, Tyalgum –
BE REFUSED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The development is not considered to be consistent with clause 4 – The aims of the Tweed Local Environmental Plan 2000;
2. The development is not considered to satisfy Clause 8(1)(b) – Consent Considerations of the Tweed Local Environmental Plan 2000 as the development is considered not to be in accordance with the aims and objectives of the plan relevant to the development;
3. The development is not considered to satisfy Clause 8(1)(c) – Consent Considerations of the Tweed Local Environmental Plan 2000 as the development is considered to have an unacceptable cumulative impact on the community, locality and catchment;
4. The development is not considered to satisfy Clause 39A(2)(d) – Bushfire Protection of the Tweed Local Environmental Plan 2000 as the development is considered to have an unacceptable bushfire risk;
5. The development is not considered to satisfy Clause 7.10(e) – Essential Services of the Draft Local Environmental Plan 2014 as the development fails to provide suitable vehicular access to proposed Lot 2;
6. The development is not considered to satisfy the aims of Section A2 – Site Access and Parking Code of the Tweed Development Control Plan 2008 as the proposal does not provide safe, convenient and equitable access to development land for pedestrians, cyclists, motorists and public transport users;
7. The development is not considered to satisfy Section A5 – Subdivision Manual of the Tweed Development Control Plan 2008 as the proposal does not provide access to a public road that is readily upgraded to all weather two wheel drive standard and is not safe from bushfire;
8. The development is not considered to satisfy Section 100B of the Rural Fires Act 1997 as the proposal does not provide access that can comply with Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006; and
9. Landowners consent has not been provided for the proposed access through proposed Lot 1.
The Motion was Carried.
FOR VOTE – Voting – Unanimous
ABSENT. DID NOT VOTE – Cr C Byrne, Cr M Armstrong
http://
